Have you created an IGSN ID Catalog Repository?
An IGSN ID Catalog Repository is necessary to begin registering IGSN IDs. See Creating an IGSN ID Catalog Repository to get started.
There is no functional distinction between IGSN IDs and other DOIs registered with DataCite. Thus, the same DataCite APIs used to create and modify DOIs can also be used to create and modify IGSN IDs.
We recommend using DataCite’s REST API for your institution’s IGSN ID registration processes. Please refer to the existing DataCite REST API guide to determine the most appropriate implementation for your institution and workflows. You may also review our API Reference page.
IGSN IDs for material samples are registered with metadata encoded in the DataCite Metadata Schema. Consult IGSN ID Metadata for best practices and guidance concerning mandatory and recommended properties in the DataCite Metadata Schema.
For further information about the DataCite Metadata Schema, see DataCite Metadata Schema documentation.
IGSN IDs registered with DataCite will be assigned a DOI prefix and suffix. The DOI prefix will depend on the prefix assigned to your IGSN ID Catalog Repository, and the syntax of the DOI suffix is up to your institution. In Fabrica and DataCite APIs, the system will automatically assign a random string upon creation unless a specific suffix is supplied.
The IGSN e.V. plans to develop disciplinary best practices for DOI suffixes in collaboration with a variety of samples communities as they begin to register IGSN IDs with DataCite. If you are interested in contributing to DOI suffix best practices, contact the IGSN e.V. at [email protected].
For additional information on how your institution might implement DOI suffixes for IGSN IDs, see the DOI Basics section on suffixes and our knowledge base article about characters in DOI suffixes.
Please consult the IGSN–DataCite Namespaces and Prefixes Recommendation for an overview of the history of IGSN ID namespace governance, as well as recommendations for the future of namespace governance and resolution. The recommendation was produced by the IGSN–DataCite Namespace Working Group.
Depending on your institution’s workflows for assigning IGSN IDs, you may find DataCite’s Draft state helpful. No metadata is required for Draft state. Thus, Draft state may be appropriate for workflows where identifiers are assigned in the field or in advance of sample collection. Draft state can later be changed to Registered or Findable state when at least the six mandatory DataCite metadata properties are populated. See our support documentation on DOI states.
The DataCite Metadata Schema also provides a set of standard values that may be used when mandatory property values are not available for various reasons. Please see Appendix 3 and Table 11 of the DataCite Metadata Schema 4.4 documentation for more information about these values. Example standard values for unknown information include “:unac” for “temporarily inaccessible” and “:unav” for “value unavailable, possibly unknown.”
We are eager to understand your use cases and user needs for IGSN IDs in DataCite services. These contributions will help shape the future of DataCite’s Product Roadmap for IGSN IDs.
Please submit ideas to our Product Roadmap or contribute feature suggestions using our New Feature Suggestion form. Cody Ross, Application Support Engineer ([email protected]), is also available to discuss how DataCite services might more effectively support IGSN IDs and material samples.
Updated 6 months ago